Blog

Cyclicals 2.0: Green and Digital

The text book rules about where to invest following a recession may not apply in a post-pandemic world; more than bricks and mortar, stimulus efforts are green and digital now.

Things are looking up, sort of. Economies are slowly reopening, and economic data show encouraging signs of life. While it remains unclear how fast the recovery will be or if there will be widespread relapses in COVID-19 cases (some areas are already reporting increases) and a return to economic shutdowns, it is worth considering what to do ahead of a potential post-pandemic recovery that will, eventually, materialize.

Typically, it makes sense to increase exposure to cyclical sectors and companies early in the economic cycle in order to enjoy the recovery ahead. However, the old textbook rules may no longer apply in an era of disruption, and they might even bring disappointment. This time, investors may be better off following the money with an eye towards the measures that governments are applying to kick-start their economies. Focusing on these policies may not only help identify potential winners, but also potential losers, given the disruptive nature of some of the stark fiscal action witnessed over the past four months.

While unique and specific to each country or region, the policy moves seen around much of the world have an unusual amount of commonality with substantial support recurring around two broad themes: green and digital. This is a meaningful change from the traditional infrastructure boost applied to recover from previous recessions.

Figure one is a table detailing overall fiscal stimulus and policy for Europe, Germany, China and South Korea, as of 31 May 2020. 

Let’s look at both recovery themes in more detail:

  • Green: On May 15th of this year, Chancellor Merkel and President Macron proposed a EUR 500 billion Economic Recovery Plan and spelt out clearly: recovery will be different and green. Even China, which has relied on an infrastructure drive to fuel growth over the past two decades, has said that recovery will not be based on bricks and mortar. And South Korea, an export champion, has designed a stimulus package focused on digitalization and de-globalization, which is also protective of public health and the environment.

    Against this backdrop, electric vehicles and batteries, as well as solar energy devices, seem prime candidates to benefit from subsidies and government spending. This also happens at a time when technological advances and costs have turned these green alternatives into increasingly palatable options, and not only the luxury of environmentally conscious wealthy nations or the privilege of sunny countries. Further, governments are also likely to increase tax on pollution-heavy processes and habits, keen as they are to go green.
  • Digital: In a recent blog, we highlighted the structural and behavioral changes likely to emanate from the COVID pandemic, but this will be further boosted with targeted efforts by governments to support their economies’ ability to compete in an increasingly digital world in building “new infrastructure” around 5G, Wi Fi 6, cloud service providers and data centers, artificial intelligence, big data and smart cities. Among other things, this is expected to lead to increased demand for semiconductors – for instance, moving from a 4G to a 5G network increases semiconductors by 200-300%. In addition to the digital infrastructure mentioned above, companies are being incentivized, both economically and politically, to bring some production back home. But, in order to make this repatriation move worth it, companies will need to increase the automation of their processes in an effort to cut costs. In fact, automation was one of the top priorities mentioned by a high number of company officials during recent, first-quarter earnings calls. Demand for robots is expected to jump sharply over the coming years as these trends unfold and robotics and process automation firms supported by the new digital infrastructure will likely play a big role as the integration of the world economy slows.

Figure 2 shows a graph of the industrial robot price index superimposed with the installed base of robots globally, over the time period 1995 to 2025. The price index falls over time, as the base of robots increases. The two lines intersect around 2016, when the price index falls to 100, and the installed base reaches about 2 million. Around 2025, the graph forecasts the index falling to near 90, while the number of installed robots surpasses 5 million.

Times have changed. The green and digital messages are increasing and hard to ignore. We may be ahead of a new cyclical era, or Cyclicality 2.0. If the previous one was defined by infrastructure projects as the main recipient of public investment funds, this second version of cyclical recovery focuses more on ethereal elements that surround and support us: It’s chips, not bricks, that matter.

PIMCO identified some of these themes in our 2019 Secular Outlook, naming six disruptors that are changing the world. It seems that the global pandemic is only accelerating these trends and, as investors, we remain highly vigilant as these shifts will make or break businesses and even entire sectors.

While the uncertainty about secular trends and the more imminent post-pandemic recovery remains high, we see greater certainty that the recovery will be environmentally cleaner and digitally driven. Cyclical 2.0 is upon us.

Please see PIMCO’s “Investing in Uncertain Markets” page for our latest insights into market volatility and the implications for the economy and investors.

Geraldine Sundstrom is a managing director and portfolio manager focusing on asset allocation strategies and is a regular contributor to the PIMCO Blog.

The Author

Geraldine Sundstrom

Portfolio Manager, Asset Allocation

View Profile

Latest Insights

Related

Blog
Post-COVID Economy: Not the Way We Were

Post‑COVID Economy: Not the Way We Were

The COVID-19 crisis is likely to accelerate many underlying, secular disruptive forces already affecting economies and financial markets. This may only increase the difference between those companies, sectors, and countries that are being disrupted, and those that are acting more like disruptors. Distinguishing between the two is becoming crucial.

Disclosures

Asset Allocation Views: Late Cycle vs. End Cycle Investing
XDismiss Next Article