Blog

Key Geopolitical Risks to Oil in 2020

Tensions in the Middle East and North Africa have once again brought geopolitical risks to the forefront of oil markets.

The recent killing of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani by the U.S. and the subsequent Iranian attack on Iraqi military bases housing U.S. soldiers have once again brought geopolitical risks to the forefront of oil markets. Given the global oil market has been in a deficit and nearly all spare capacity globally is held in a few key Gulf Cooperation Council countries, any disruption to oil production or exports from the region would likely have meaningful implications for oil prices.

Below, we discuss three hot spots we are monitoring. These areas of greatest concern today tilt primarily to upside risk to prices, particularly with an easing of U.S.–China trade tensions. However, there are regions and scenarios we do not have the space here to discuss, we expect new risks will likely emerge, and not all risks will be price-bullish.

Iran: While at the time of this writing fears of escalation between Iran and the U.S. have diminished based on statements from U.S. President Donald Trump and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, it is hard for us to send an all-clear signal. Under the current U.S. administration, the tension between the U.S. and Iran has been steadily increasing over the past few years. U.S. sanctions have brought significant pain to the Iranian economy, leading Iran to respond by attacking American allies in the region. While there have been bouts of hope over the past few years that a détente would be in the offing, neither side appears willing to acquiesce to the demands of the other. Tensions at the beginning of this year followed the U.S. withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal, formally the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), in 2018, and Iran gradually reducing its compliance with limitations on its nuclear program agreed to under the JCPOA (though Iran still has not increased processing purity to a more concerning 20% and still allows International Atomic Energy Agency inspections and collaboration). Indeed, the U.S. and Iran remain far apart on a variety of issues, and sanctions on Iranian oil exports will likely remain. In summary, the overarching reasons for concerns have not changed from a few weeks ago, and recent events might foreshadow something worse yet to come, though we hope not. This is even more problematic in the situation where production or exports from neighboring countries are impacted, given limited spare oil production or export capacity outside the Middle East.

Iraq: Even before the events of January, the political situation in Iraq could be at best described as problematic. While Iraq has managed to maintain and grow oil output despite political instability and constraints on water resources in past years, recent protests, a caretaker government, and Iraq serving as a proxy for Iran/U.S. tensions create uncertainty about future output and stability. While we view the imposition of U.S. sanctions on Iraq as improbable, the failure to renew a waiver for natural gas imports from Iran could create problems with producing electricity ahead of summer in Iraq, which historically has added to political uncertainty.

North Africa: One of the most important and least-discussed oil market risks in our estimation is Libya, where discussions of a cease-fire between rival factions are currently underway. While output is at post-Gaddafi highs, recent heated fighting between the two competing governments and the failure so far of the international community to successfully mediate the conflict bode poorly for output stability. If anything, the deepening involvement of other nations – supplying money, arms, and combatants – in the conflict likely exacerbates the problem rather than ameliorating it. Another regional concern, albeit not quite as kinetic, is the power transition in Algeria. While we aren’t expecting armed conflict, the political uncertainty at the very least could continue to deprive the nation of investment needed to sustain output.

Implications for commodity investors

While as of this writing no incremental oil output has been disrupted by the most recent geopolitical events, above and beyond the voluntary and involuntary OPEC curtailments, the backdrop is largely supportive for commodity investors. The oil market has remained sufficiently tight over the past year to remain in backwardation, supporting the prospect for positive returns from investing in oil. As highlighted in a previous blog post, backwardation is a catalyst for investor returns. At the very least, investors should consider the diversification and tail risk hedging properties of a commodity investment.

For more on the geopolitical risks that could affect the economy and markets over the next year, see the “dealing with disruption” section in our latest Cyclical Outlook, “Seven Macro Themes for 2020.”

Greg Sharenow is a portfolio manager focusing on real assets and is a regular contributor to the PIMCO Blog.

The Author

Greg E. Sharenow

Portfolio Manager, Real Assets

View Profile

Latest Insights

Related

Disclosures

All investments contain risk and may lose value. Commodities contain heightened risk, including market, political, regulatory and natural conditions, and may not be suitable for all investors. There is no guarantee that these investment strategies will work under all market conditions or are suitable for all investors and each investor should evaluate their ability to invest long-term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. Investors should consult their investment professional prior to making an investment decision.

Does ESG Matter for Sovereign Debt Investing?
XDismiss Next Article