Viewpoints

Behavioral Science in Uncertain Times

During periods of extreme market volatility, investors often focus on short-term returns not long-term goals. Learn how advisors can help reduce negative consequences of emotional decision making by providing valuable guidance in this video.

More from this section

Read Transcript

Text on screen: PIMCO Educational Presentation: "Behavioral Guidance During Market Volatility" with host John Nersesian (15 minutes)

Hi, I’m John Nersesian, Head of Advisor Education at PIMCO. Thanks for spending some time with us to review some really important concepts around behavioral guidance during market volatility.

I recognize that as financial advisors, you have many different challenges before you, providing investment guidance, doing advanced financial planning, helping your clients set realistic goals and managing expectations. There’s another important role, though, within the function of a financial advisor, and that is providing the kind of guidance needed to manage emotions and to help our clients make better decisions in an attempt to achieve better outcomes.

For those of you who are less familiar with the concept of behavioral finance, its roots go back many years. Conventional finance, the subject that we studied many years ago at university, suggests that individuals evaluate their options and they optimize their decisions to achieve the best outcomes.

But in the real world, decisions are often not made that way. Investors don’t often process information correctly. They infer incorrect probabilities and make mistakes regarding the assumptions of future rates of return. These behavioral biases often have a significant impact on both the decisions we make and the outcomes that we eventually achieve. Let’s take a closer look at the cost of these bad behaviors.

Chart: The bar chart breaks down the cost of investor behavior on returns: 20-years average index (S&P 500, 5.6%) and average equity fund investor (3.9%), with a behavior gap of 1.1%.

Studies done suggest that the investor return is often very different from the investments in which they choose. Investment results are often dependent on investor behaviors, not only which assets they choose but when they choose to invest and their decisions along the way to either add capital or to remove it. You’ll notice the numbers on our slide. A 5.6% rate of return, very competitive for the index itself. The average investor, unfortunately, earned a substantially lower rate of return, 3.9%. Now, we’ll examine some of the causes behind these poor decisions in a moment, but before we do, let’s put some numbers behind these behavioral differences to really understand their impact.

The cost of these bad behaviors can be meaningful, and our hypothetical example, we assume an investor adds $19,500 per year. That’s the maximum 401k contribution in 2020. We’re going to assume that that investor makes regular contributions to their plan for a 40-year time horizon.

Chart: The double line chart depicts the hypothetical portfolio difference between annual returns of 3.9% (average equity investor) versus 5.6% (the S&P 500): $920,848.

So, what if the investor earned the return of the actual market itself? The market return, the investment result was $2.7 million. The investor’s return, using the example from the slide before, was only $1.8 million. The difference in terminal value due to poor decision making, bad behaviors, was $920,000 or a 51% increase.

What are some of the biases that we find investors are often guilty of? We’ve identified three. Three among many that we’ll be addressing today. Loss aversion, recency bias, and anchoring. 

Let’s start first with loss aversion. It’s suggested that loss aversion is maybe the most powerful of the biases that we face. It’s premised around the idea that the pain of losses is twice as great as the pleasure earned in gains. This often prevents us from unloading an unprofitable position. 

A security that is down in value from our original investment, because we choose not to accept defeat, and we want to avoid the emotional pain that accompanies a financial loss. It also causes investors to take additional risk in an attempt to avoid pain from losses.

Sometimes we double down on an unprofitable position hoping that an eventual rebound will eliminate or reduce the probability of a loss. Here are some examples of loss aversion.

Chart: This chart looks at loss aversion and how it prevents investors from unloading unprofitable investments. It pictorially depicts two trajectory curves moving in opposite directions. In one direction, the trajectory curve of an increase in pleasure as $100 gains in value is a gentle upward slope. The chart that shows the trajectory curve of a decrease in value of $100 is steeper and shorter than the previous slope.

We invest only in safe vestments with low returns, which ultimately reduces our future purchasing power. There’s a cost to that safety.

We hold a stock that trades below its current purchase price simply in an attempt to avoid taking the loss for financial purposes. It’s the idea that the homeowner is unwilling to list their home for what is the fair market value because that value is less than what they may have paid for that house a number of years earlier.

The second bias that we’ll examine is known as recency bias or trend chasing.

Chart: The chart depicts a line graph overlaying a bar chart. The line graph shows growth of a hypothetical $100,000 investment increasing and decreasing from 2006 to 2008 for a portfolio created by an emotional investor (60% stocks, S&P 500/40% bonds, Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index); from 2008 to 2010 the line is increasing and is composed of 60% stocks (S&P 500) and 40% bonds (Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index) (LHS). The bar chart shows monthly net flows in billions into markets, consistent increases from 2006 to 2007, outflow in 2007, dramatic outflows between 2008and 2009, then more outflows before 2010.

It’s the idea that investors unfortunately fail to consider all of the different outcomes and opportunities before them. They make their decisions based on the trends that are afoot at that moment in time.

We weigh those datapoints more greatly than we do the entire universe of data. We have a tendency, as we feel good during bull market experiences, to add money, often near market tops, and as market declines occur, we become frustrated and emotions take over, and that fear concept causes us to liquidate assets often closer to market bottoms.

Maybe this concept of recency bias, adding money closer to tops, reducing our exposure at mark and bottoms, maybe this is the greatest or best explanation for the difference between investment and investor results.

Another concept is known as anchoring. It’s the idea that as investors, we’re often influenced by prior purchase points, price levels, or other data that occurred in the past. We cling to these numbers, these reference points, and we use them in making decisions as to whether to buy or sell.

Let’s take a look at the most recent example.

Chart: A chart explains what "anchoring" bias is (when investors are influenced by purchase points or arbitrary price levels) and how people behave. The accompanying line graph shows the performance of the S&P 500 Index from 2017 to 2020.

We know that many investors will be somewhat disappointed when they open their current statements, seeing a dramatic decline in asset values most likely since the peak of February 19th

You’ll notice that the S&P 500 peaked at 3386 on Feb. 19. The investor will use the most current statement and most likely compared their current balance against that prior peak. But what if we changed our reference point? What if we changed the datapoint to which we anchor?

For example, a year ago, on March 25th of 2019, the S&P traded at approximately 2800. And we anchored instead to a year earlier, the market bottom, at 2351, the investor, in fact, would not be facing a loss from that price point but a gain instead.

So, now that we’re aware of the impact of behavioral biases and some of those that exist and are most prevalent in investor decision making, what are some of the tools that are available to us to help mitigate the cost of bad behaviors? We’ve identified three.

We’re going to focus on understanding, behavioral risk, we’ll take a look at a tried and true methodology known as rebalancing, and then we’ll also introduce a new concept known as asset bucketing.

Behavior risk tolerance is important to understand as advisors,

Chart: The chart highlights eight questions that can be used to identify investors' behavioral risks.

after all, our clients have a financial risk tolerance, a volatility, a maximum loss that they can suffer financially, but the question I ask is what is their emotional tolerance in assuming or enduring risk?

Here are some interesting questions that may be helpful in the pursuit of better understanding your client’s behavioral risk tolerance. How has the recent volatility affected you? Has it changed any of your long-term personal goals? Are you comfortable with what you hold today, and if not, what specific changes might you be contemplating? If you received new money today, given current volatility, how would invest those dollars? What would be more important to you at this point in time? Regaining the value of your portfolio that was recently lost or protecting the capital that you still have today? How do you define risk? How do you measure it? And what tools or strategies do you use to manage it?

Hopefully these kinds of questions could be a great starting point for an in-depth dialog to demonstrate our empathy, our professionalism, our thoroughness, our willingness to do the work required to better understand our client’s concerns and to spend the time and the energy required to provide them with suitable recommendations.

Portfolio rebalancing definitely adds to return and helps to lower volatility, but maybe the greatest benefit of portfolio rebalancing is non-financial. It’s emotional. It’s the idea that portfolio rebalancing, when followed and implemented on a regular basis, instills a sense of discipline into an emotionally charged world. 

After all, rebalancing requires us to do what is emotionally uncomfortable but financially productive. Think about it. Rebalancing requires the investor to reduce their exposure to assets that have done well recently and to redeploy those assets into securities or asset classes that have done less well.

We provide an example based on the market returns in 2008.

Chart: The chart looks at portfolio rebalancing after market declines by comparing an initial allocation January 20008 of $1 million with an allocation profile in January 2009 and a reduced portfolio value of $753,605.

You will take a look at the hypothetical portfolio on the left, a $1 million portfolio divided across five different strategies: 30% in fixed income and 70% in different equity sleeves.

Take a look at the middle of the chart, the performance in 2008, and for those of you who were in practice back then, I don’t need to remind you of the fact that 2008 was a very disappointing experience. All four equity strategies in my hypothetical declined by more than 35%. The only asset class that held its value was fixed income.

Now, I’ll move to the pie on the right-hand side of the chart. You’ll notice a year later, as clients are revisiting their portfolio holdings in January of 2009, a 25% decline in their overall portfolio put a shift in the composition. 

Clients, based on their policy guidelines, are now underweight equities and overweight fixed income. What was the client’s temptation? Were they likely to rebalance their portfolios and to add money to equities at depressed values? If anything, many clients, in fact, were tempted to do the opposite, exhibiting frustration and disappointment with recent results, and in many circumstances, chose to move to cash.

A disciplined rebalancing methodology would have required this client to add money to assets that were undervalued by removing dollars from the asset class that did well. Now, please understand that rebalancing is not intended to be a market timing tool. There is no way to predict future asset classes and their resulting performance. Rebalancing helps us to guide clients through periods of emotional volatility, to instill discipline, and to help them increase the probabilities of successful outcomes.

Another strategy is the concept of asset bucketing. It’s a form of mental accounting. So, clients, of course, have various goals of different importance that occur at different stages in their lives, and when they look at their portfolio in aggregate, periods of volatility, like the one we’re experiencing today may be very concerning.

I need money to buy that second home. I have a short-term need and a desire for safety for the dollars that I’ll be using to educate my children. And so, when clients look at the total portfolio value and the volatility that we’re experiencing today, they may become dissuaded from embracing a long-term investment strategy.

But what if we took an approach that was somewhat different? What if we immunized by identifying different liabilities or goals to help our clients become more comfortable with the dollars that they set aside to satisfy those short-term goals while also allowing them to embrace riskier assets to produce the higher returns required to achieve their long-term financial goals.

Chart: The chart outlines a hypothetical asset bucketing strategy via client goals (buy second home [cash], education [mostly fixed income, some equities and alternatives], lifestyle [mostly equities, large portion fixed income, some alternatives], bequests [mostly equities, equal parts alternatives and fixed income]) a time horizon (from shortest to longest), dollar amount (all $1 million), priority level (high or low) and strategy.

You’ll notice four different goals that we’ve identified on our slide, the resulting time horizons, a hypothetical dollar amount, and then different bucketed strategies, different portfolio sleeves that each present different liquidity constraints and different expected rates of return to help the client become more comfortable in embracing an overall strategy.

Text on screen: Behavioral Guidance During Market Volatility
Presentation Goals: Market volatility and behavioral finance, the cost of bad behavior, biases during volatility, strategies to mitigate behavioral biases

Thanks for spending some with us to review our materials on behavioral guidance during market volatility. We hope that you found the material to be useful.

Text on screen: Advisor Education at PIMCO
Visit us at pimco.com/advisoreducation
It includes: White papers and blogs, resources to use in your practice, On-demand Continuing Education (CE), Comprehensive Curriculum outlining offering

We encourage you to reach out to your local PIMCO account manager to learn more about the resources that we’ve developed to support your educational needs and those that are available to support your relationship with your clients as well. Thank you for joining us.

Text on screen: Key Takeaways

  • Advisor action steps
  • Identify behavioral biases for your clients
  • Refocus clients on long-term goals and objectives
  • Consider various strategies to mitigate investor behavior such as: maintain perspective, stay diversified, rebalance regularly

Disclosure


Recorded on 27 March, 2020

IMPORTANT NOTICE

Please note that the following contains the opinions of the manager as of the date noted, and may not have been updated to reflect real time market developments. All opinions are subject to change without notice.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE

HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.

RISK

All investments contain risk and may lose value. There is no guarantee that an investment strategy will work under all market conditions or are suitable for all investors and each investor should evaluate their ability to invest long-term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. Investors should consult their investment professional prior to making an investment decision.

This material contains the current opinions of the manager and such opinions are subject to change without notice. This material is distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed.

PIMCO as a general matter provides services to qualified institutions, financial intermediaries and institutional investors. Individual investors should contact their own financial professional to determine the most appropriate investment options for their financial situation. This is not an offer to any person in any jurisdiction where unlawful or unauthorized. |Pacific Investment Management Company LLC, 650 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 is regulated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission |PIMCO Europe Ltd(Company No. 2604517) and PIMCO Europe Ltd - Italy (Company No. 07533910969) are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (12 Endeavour Square, London E20 1JN) in the UK. The Italy branch is additionally regulated by the Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB) in accordance with Article 27 of the Italian Consolidated Financial Act. PIMCO Europe Ltd services are available only to professional clients as defined in the Financial Conduct Authority’s Handbook and are not available to individual investors, who should not rely on this communication. |PIMCO Deutschland GmbH(Company No. 192083, Seidlstr. 24-24a, 80335 Munich, Germany), PIMCO Deutschland GmbH Italian Branch (Company No. 10005170963) and PIMCO Deutschland GmbH Spanish Branch (N.I.F. W2765338E) are authorised and regulated by the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) (Marie- Curie-Str. 24-28, 60439 Frankfurt am Main) in Germany in accordance with Section 32 of the German Banking Act (KWG). The Italian Branch and Spanish Branch are additionally supervised by the Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB) in accordance with Article 27 of the Italian Consolidated Financial Act and the Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV) in accordance with obligations stipulated in articles 168 and203to 224, as well as obligations contained in Tile V, Section I of the Law on the Securities Market (LSM) and in articles 111, 114 and 117 of Royal Decree 217/2008, respectively. The services provided by PIMCO Deutschland GmbH are available only to professional clients as defined in Section 67 para. 2 German Securities Trading Act (WpHG). They are not available to individual investors, who should not rely on this communication. |PIMCO (Schweiz) GmbH(registered in Switzerland, Company No. CH-020.4.038.582-2), Brandschenkestrasse 41, 8002 Zurich, Switzerland, Tel: + 41 44 512 49 10. The services provided by PIMCO (Schweiz) GmbH are not available to individual investors, who should not rely on this communication but contact their financial adviser. |PIMCO Asia Pte Ltd(Registration No. 199804652K) is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as a holder of a capital markets services licence and an exempt financial adviser. The asset management services and investment products are not available to persons where provision of such services and products is unauthorised. |PIMCO Asia Limitedis licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission for Types 1, 4 and 9 regulated activities under the Securities and Futures Ordinance. PIMCO Asia Limited is registered as a cross-border discretionary investment manager with the Financial Supervisory Commission of Korea (Registration No. 08-02-307). The asset management services and investment products are not available to persons where provision of such services and products is unauthorised. |PIMCO Australia PtyLtd ABN 54 084 280 508, AFSL 246862. This publication has been prepared without taking into account the objectives, financial situation or needs of investors. Before making an investment decision, investors should obtain professional advice and consider whether the information contained herein is appropriate having regard to their objectives, financial situation and needs. |PIMCO Japan Ltd,Financial Instruments Business Registration Number is Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Firm) No. 382. PIMCO Japan Ltd is a member of Japan Investment Advisers Association and The Investment Trusts Association, Japan. All investments contain risk. There is no guarantee that the principal amount of the investment will be preserved, or that a certain return will be realized; the investment could suffer a loss. All profits and losses incur to the investor. The amounts, maximum amounts and calculation methodologies of each type of fee and expense and their total amounts will vary depending on the investment strategy, the status of investment performance, period of management and outstanding balance of assets and thus such fees and expenses cannot be set forth herein. |PIMCO Taiwan Limitedis managed and operated independently. The reference number of business license of the company approved by the competent authority is (107) FSC SICE Reg. No.001. 40F., No.68, Sec. 5, Zhongxiao E. Rd., Xinyi Dist., Taipei City 110, Taiwan (R.O.C.), Tel: +886 2 8729-5500.|PIMCO Canada Corp.(199 Bay Street, Suite 2050, Commerce Court Station, P.O. Box 363, Toronto, ON, M5L 1G2) services and products may only be available in certain provinces or territories of Canada and only through dealers authorized for that purpose. |PIMCO Latin AmericaAv. Brigadeiro Faria Lima 3477, Torre A, 5° andar São Paulo, Brazil 04538-133. | No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission. PIMCO is a trademark of Allianz Asset Management of America L.P. in the United States and throughout the world.

©2020 PIMCO.

CMR2020-0409-2020

Filters: Reset All

Filters

Close Filters Dropdown
  • Tags

    Reset

    Close
  • Category

    Reset

    Economic and Market Commentary
    Investment Strategies
    Bond by Bond
    Viewpoints
    Careers
    Education
    PIMCO Foundation
    View from the Investment Committee
    Close
  • Order By

    Reset

    Alphabetical
    Most Recent
    Close
() filters applied

Multimedia Finder

Filter By:
  • Economic and Market Commentary
  • Viewpoints
  • Careers
  • Understanding Investing
  • View from the Investment Committee
  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • F
  • H
  • I
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • P
  • R
  • S
  • W
Clear
Tina Adatia
Fixed Income Strategist
Olivia A. Albrecht
Head of ESG Business Strategy
Joshua Anderson
Head of Global ABS Portfolio Management
Andrew Balls
CIO Global Fixed Income
Justin Blesy
Asset Allocation Strategist
David L. Braun
Head of US Financial Institutions Portfolio Management
Nathaniel Brown
Erin Browne
Portfolio Manager, Asset Allocation
Libby Cantrill
Head of Public Policy
Pramol Dhawan
Head of Emerging Markets Portfolio Management
Joachim Fels
Global Economic Advisor
David Fisher
Head of Traditional Product Strategies
Gregory Hall
Head of U.S. Global Wealth Management
Mary Hoppe
Daniel H. Hyman
Head of Agency MBS Portfolio Management
Daniel J. Ivascyn
Group Chief Investment Officer
Mark R. Kiesel
CIO Global Credit
Christine Long
Scott A. Mather
CIO U.S. Core Strategies
John Murray
Portfolio Manager, Commercial Real Estate
John Nersesian
Head of Advisor Education
Sonali Pier
Portfolio Manager, Multi-Sector Credit
Libby Rodney
Steve A. Rodosky
Portfolio Manager, Real Return and Long Duration
Emmanuel Roman
Chief Executive Officer
Steve Sapra
Client Solutions & Analytics
Jerome M. Schneider
Head of Short-Term Portfolio Management
Marc P. Seidner
CIO Non-traditional Strategies
Greg E. Sharenow
Portfolio Manager, Real Assets
Anmol Sinha
Fixed Income Strategist
Candice Stack
Head of Client Management, Americas
Cathy Stahl
Global Head of Marketing
Geraldine Sundstrom
Portfolio Manager, Asset Allocation
Jamie Weinstein
Portfolio Manager, Head of Corporate Special Situations
Tiffany Wilding
North American Economist
PIMCO
  • Alphabetical
  • Most Recent
Section : Date : Experts :
Reset All
Reason for Optimism
Confronting Lower Returns and Higher Volatility
Economic Disruptors and Swing Factors
Investment Opportunities Over the Secular Horizon
Looking for Alternatives?  Access New Opportunities with PIMCO
Viewpoints

Looking for Alternatives? Access New Opportunities with PIMCO(video)

Looking for Alternatives? Access New Opportunities with PIMCO

Recent market dislocations have created opportunities for alternatives investors who are prepared and flexible. Explore the markets PIMCO is focused on today and how our broad platform can help investors pursue attractive return potential.

MORE ON ALTERNATIVES AT PIMCO

Finding Resiliency in a Long Recovery

Load more results Load {{cCtrl.fetchResults}} more results

PIMCO

UAE

unidentified

[change]

Subscribe
Please input a valid email address.